Bayer 04 fc

Bayer 04 fc idea

We need a strategy a long run strategy for investing in environmental research and ME. Should be the owner of that on behalf of all the other agencies that they've got they've got to collaborate, but you should be able to say looking at 20 years looking at 50 years bayer 04 fc are the things we can never walk away from. We are always going to have to maintain expertise and grow our knowledge and and this is classic public good stuff.

It's this is not generating you know space rockets from here or anything you know it's this is just long run stuff and what. Don't know can hurt you or when something changes then you need to know what's happening environments are dynamic ecosystems. Things are changing all the time so understanding what is out there is important and you'll find also there is a statement in here that we need to integrate Marta Omari because this is a bayer 04 fc of knowledge d dima predates.

European fight or flight response in terms of what that can tell us that is. Critically important we've we've we've a lot. It happens depends on what was also bayer 04 fc the pot that year. That's bayer 04 fc is my this is. My view the patient interpretation and understanding of environmental change unfolding over decades does not need to be a slave to novelty or bayer 04 fc although those qualities may well be an evidence, it's often through meticulous continuous work that real applicable discoveries are made bayer 04 fc this is the issue that if you have a contest system bayer 04 fc says excellent impact it takes you.

It's quite hard to fight against that if you're in the long run, you know research. You know a family of plants or insects or you're following. I do you think bayer 04 fc need to say that we. A fence the resources we're prepared to put to bayer 04 fc, and this is a really a matter of you as legislators when you report to taxpayers, Where did you spend the money.

I think you should be able to say we've decided to give this bayer 04 fc to bayer 04 fc environment broadly defined and that is the long run level of investment that we're talking h i v and then I say I think bayer 04 fc need that money to be allocated by people who are familiar with environmental research, one of the problems.

We have is that we fund through multiple mechanisms, but very often the people who are handing it out really don't know much about environmental research. They know a lot about funding systems and they know a lot about systems but my own view is that you do need to if you're going to spend money in this area, you need people bayer 04 fc understand the field of research broadly broadly speaking now in contest systems, there is a risk of capture, which is often I think what makes me.

About this MB does this with the endeavor Fund by using mainly overseas people on their on their allocation of the science board. You could do the same thing here. My view is that you need to either build that capability and envy or and this is my preferred option, Establish an Environmental research Council to fund the money so you as the policy makers through with the assistance of ministries, decide the strategy you bayer 04 fc hand money to an expert purchaser who you then hold to account for sticking to the strategy.

Over time is this money going to answer the sort of questions, but it's an expert panel. It's beyond political interference. I think that would be the best way to go and you know you you you can use overseas suicidio there.

And interested and I think thank you that was a very good summary of what is a very important report and the fact that we have two committees meeting together to consider it as a recognition of that.

I think the first question from doctor Deborah Russell. This is really interesting. I've been reading some other stuff around science funding in the last few few days as well and that horrendous gram is. I take you over point a point that we need more direction over environmental research, but I'm wondering to what extent this extraordinary. Is driven by the fact that we established the CR is back in 1992 as sort of as a competitive way of doing science rather than as a collaborative way of doing science, I don't think it's got anything to do with.

That's the the way you organize the bayer 04 fc of this stuff. It's a question Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (Vyvanse)- Multum how you fund CR is or universities or or anyone else who's doing research or compete if the system. It's competitive and they'll collaborate if the system is collaborative and I think that's really the way bayer 04 fc has to be.

I think it needs to be collaborative. I think it's sale careprost very good sense not to have a mega science department vast great bureaucracy. I think the CR is are a really good way of bringing together sectors or areas of bayer 04 fc where there's no common interests, but I think the funding yeah, I think we've learned over the last two or three decades. That's a competitive model doesn't work for everything.

I think it works quite well for for other. I mean, if you're trying to if you're trying to encourage the government thinks it's a role to try to encourage research in in new technologies that. But this is bayer 04 fc public. This is you know what's driving the decline in the eel population, so we need every expert who's got expertise whether they're in a university, whether they're bayer 04 fc a car whether they're aron whether they're in a bayer 04 fc. Council We need collaboration and so when you spend that money the people who do the spending need to say right here is the broad area we need research and here are some of the priorities.

What are the collaboratively that you can book to take 6 to choose from so if I can follow up on something you see there that you've mentioned public good science, Let's say you've given the example of new technology science, but there's bayer 04 fc will be other examples where the competitive model may work well so as you're feeling. And I am assuming it's not really public good science as well. Ah when bayer 04 fc the environment.

Well, do you see models and other areas. When we've got, we've got the model actually and that is the health research council. I mean, we have a health research council. I don't know, how bayer 04 fc funny gets these days, but you parliament votes, certain amount of money and you don't do through a bureaucracy of health, you got a research council, you bayer 04 fc a expect bayer 04 fc who know what they are doing and via making They're trying to make the best they can out of the money that Parliament gives them and you can review their performance and and and and bayer 04 fc that is it's competitive in the sense that there's only so much money, but one bayer 04 fc the ways you get the most out of it in that situation is to encourage collaboration So if you look at the United Kingdom, I'm not an expert on it, but you've got a number of research councils you've got is it nine is bayer 04 fc, it says.

Oh, I don't know if you wanted to to investigate this. They do and they have one in this broader Environment, Natural resources area and it's got real reputation. It's been there bayer 04 fc long time and it has been the source of some you know quite adventurous and and important initiatives. So I think you. That's why you need. Overseas people involved in this, you need the ability to ensure that it doesn't captured, but I think we've gone to the other extreme actually and I think it might be time to give this you know.

This is ultimately taxpayers money, so you have to be able to explain bayer 04 fc them why some things got funded and some things didn't just one last question in that regard. Because I've heard varying opinions of the health Research Council and one is exactly that issue you alluded to of it being bayer 04 fc not a close shop, but nevertheless it's an avenue. Yeah, a small community and avenue whereby those who are established, get even more established and it can be very hard for Blue Sky Research or for new researchers to to to get funding via that.

That's that's that is a risk you have to guard against by the way even if you did.



23.05.2019 in 23:09 icocva77:
Идея хорошая, согласен с Вами.

27.05.2019 in 00:56 beaudernoja:
В этом что-то есть. Огромное спасибо за помощь в этом вопросе, теперь я не допущу такой ошибки.

27.05.2019 in 19:28 Элеонора:
Я думаю вы очень хорошо написали, многим пригодится этот опыт, причем данную тему описывали нераз но без такого подробного изложения

28.05.2019 in 04:23 Мирослава:
Работай с умом, а не до ночи